|
|
|
Ø
Due to wartime
policies, nationalised British Rail inherited fares & charges at 1941
levels, suppliers costs at 1948 levels, and a rag-bag of worn out assets. Ø
Unlike road
transport, railways were denied materials to modernise for 10 years after the
war, not allowed to use their own money to that end & directed not to
restore railways to pre-war standards. Ø
The loss of
freight to road was precipitated by government’s refusal to concede to
railways the same commercial freedom as that enjoyed by road transport. Ø
Fares were held
below inflation by a law court created for that purpose, whose legal decisions were, at times,
changed by Ministers – but only to hold fares even lower. Ø
Had fares kept
pace with inflation, by the time of privatisation, BR would have been £11
billions better off, before allowing for loss of compound interest. Ø
The secret
Stedeford committee of businessmen, appointed by the Transport Minister
criticised government for deficits, when it was expected that only British
Rail would be criticised. Their Report & Papers were kept secret for 30
years – even from MPs. Contrary to popular opinion, their recommendations
were not implemented. They said that fares were too low, closures too slow,
BR should be free to develop its property & be run by professionals. Ø
To justify its
interference in fares, a Tory government said that BR need not cover costs
from revenue, but passed Acts requiring the avoidance of loss! Ø
Delays in
delivery by suppliers and breakdowns of newly supplied rolling stock that had
to be withdrawn from service for modifications led to delays &
cancellations for which BR was blamed! Ø
In 1956, the
Transport Minister froze rail fares – then 43 points behind industry fuelled
inflation – but no other industries’ prices, promising to show how BR could
make a profit. He did not identify one
business in the private or public sector doing so, which was denied
commercial freedom by politicians. Inflation continued to rise. Ø
Politicians
had an illusion that one industry – railways - could be 100% perfect : no complaints, no breakdowns,
prices constantly below inflation, not allowed to drop unprofitable business,
nor free to decide investment. Ø
Privatisation
was promoted by pious hopes & the alleged
success of other privatisations. If past success was a guide, Ø
The ruinous
fragmentation of the railway system as part of privatisation, was not due to
any Directive from Ø
Politicians
who sneer that those calling for re-nationalisation are looking through
rose-tinted glasses should study the facts in this book. Government did not
construct measurable benchmarks for comparisons to be made with
pre-privatisation. This book has redressed that failure, and shows
performance is now worse and costs higher. Politicians always tried to
compare BR with the non-existent Perfect Industry, with which, curiously,
private sector railways are not
compared. Author
– E.A. Gibbins, joined the LMS Railway in 1946 as a junior & retired from
BR as a Chief Officer after 40 years. ISBN
0-9535225-0-4; Paperback: pages v, 212.
cover price £12.95, offered at £8 + by
post from E.A. Gibbins, 11 01270-873208
The
book was reviewed by The Railway & Canal Historical Society (July 2005),
Traction Review (June 2004). |